Looking Good

Hi, things are looking a lot better now, please forgive me as my knowledge of the background coding is very little, but by my understanding from what I see is that if something has been added incorrectly we will now easily be able to find the problems, is this correct?
—— Ecktos1 (talk) 12:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

That is mostly correct =) Until now I have focused the efforts on the parameters used for auto-categorization as they were the most likely to break the whole thing if the input wasn't in the proper format, this part is pretty much done now (apart from the "|category" and "|type" parameters, but i believe they'll become obsolete with some more tweaking). I Havn't done validation on simpler fields yet, though it's on my list and shouldn't be too much of a hassle when i do get to it. For now i'm trying to clean up the parameters so we can actually display useful information without it getting cluttered or duplicated within the template, such as i'm currently doing with the "|obtained" parameter of the item infobox,.

Anyways, long story short: Yes, i'm organizing it so the data input is filtered and flagged when the data is unrecognized or invalid. =)
--Vahlemon (talk) 12:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Excellent! I was wondering myself about |catergory and |type, especially since the developers introduced the groups. I was wondering at that point about how it would affect the categories and wished then that it could all be moved over to the groups. I could of never done what you have, top job Vahlemon, you rock!
—— Ecktos1 (talk) 12:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I have been taking a look at some of the newly edited items and have noticed an issue in the infobox regarding the text alignment, the parameters i have noticed in on so far are relating to max stack, fuel burn time and ingredients used, an example of the max stack issue can bee seen Here
—— Ecktos1 (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
All fixed! turns out i left a few blank spaces which the template didn't like! =S Let me know if you notice anything else! =)
--Vahlemon (talk) 14:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)